Judgment · Proposed experience
See What Good Looks Like
Ein Gespür für Qualität lässt sich schärfen.
Compare real examples, explain what makes them work and turn an instinct for quality into criteria you can apply and improve.
Who it is for.
People who create, review or select work, with or without AI assistance.
What to bring.
Choose a familiar format, such as an explanation or proposal. Examples are supplied.
What you take away.
- An annotated set of examples showing specific strengths and weaknesses.
- A concise quality guide with criteria and examples of what each criterion means.
- An improved piece of work with an explanation of the changes that matter.
Opens your email app with this experience in the subject. Your enquiry is non-binding; we reply by email to clarify the next steps.
The challenge.
Polish can be mistaken for quality; strong preferences can be difficult to explain. Practise recognising what makes a proposal, explanation or design useful, then test your judgment on unfamiliar examples.
What you do.
Compare a varied set of examples without author or tool labels. Make an initial choice and describe what you notice before seeing anyone else’s assessment.
Discuss disagreements against an explicit audience and purpose. Separate accuracy, usefulness and coherence from style preferences, then develop a short set of quality criteria.
Apply the criteria to a new example and improve one weak piece. Compare your reasoning with peer feedback and revise criteria that fail to help.
Show what you have learned.
Assess an unfamiliar example, justify your choice with observable features and explain which part remains a matter of preference.